Acopia Adaptive Resource Switch Manual do Utilizador Página 5

  • Descarregar
  • Adicionar aos meus manuais
  • Imprimir
  • Página
    / 10
  • Índice
  • MARCADORES
  • Avaliado. / 5. Com base em avaliações de clientes
Vista de página 4
© 2005 TechTarget Storage Magazine Page 5 of 10
P.O. Box 492|Broomfield, CO 80038-0492|
720-221-7270|info@silvertonconsulting.com
NAS consolidation alternatives
Approach
Pros
Cons
Best fits
NAS
Gateways
Available SAN storage can be
used
Easy single vendor migration
tools
Upgrade backend or front end
separately
Capacity and performance
limited to what’s available
behind a gateway
Large enterprise-class users who
already have a SAN
Single vendor consolidation
Integrated
NAS
No SAN requirements, simpler
configuration
Easy single vendor migration
tools
Compared to gateways, limit
file system, performance and
capacity may be limited
All or nothing performance
upgrades
Small to enterprise-class users
without a SAN
Single vendor consolidation
Cluster File
Systems
Able to scale out
Servers performance can be
dialed to whatever is required
Some vendors have limited or
no support for CIFS
Large compute cluster users
requiring high performance
access to file data
Parallel File
Systems
Able to scale out
Parallel file system improves
throughput and performance
Some vendors don't support
CIFS or have limited NFS
support
Parallel file access only
available on limited clients and
requires special client software
Large compute cluster users
requiring high performance
access to file data
Anybody needing parallel access
to file data
NAS
Aggregators
Heterogeneous box
consolidation
Single name space over
multiple NAS boxes
Added overhead
Additional hardware to install,
configure and maintain
Multi-box/multi-vendor
environment
Single name space
configurability/usability
Integrated NAS boxes
If SAN storage support isn't a requirement, a NAS appliance with a NAS
front end and back-end storage integrated into one unit may suffice. It may
be much easier to configure an integrated product than a gateway product
because there are no SAN configuration issues. The following integrated
NAS appliances are typical of products in this category:
* BlueArc Corp.'s Titan SiliconServer supports up to 256TB of NAS
storage with a single file system, and offers enterprise-class capabilities
such as replication and mirroring.
* EMC's NS500 and NS700 NAS series are limited to only 64TB. The
NS500 has file-system size limits compared to the NS700 and NSX
gateways (8TB maximum file system). Aside from configuration and
aggregate performance limitations, NS700 and NS500 capabilities are very
similar to the NSX gateway system using Clariion back-end arrays.
* Sun's StorEdge 5310C is an integrated NAS appliance with 64TB of
capacity (for FC storage). It also supports file system-level and back-end
replication and mirroring, depending on the hardware configuration.
Vista de página 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Comentários a estes Manuais

Sem comentários